hey, I was just browsing through one of the most famous thread on Warrior forums in which Angela speaks about importance of backlinks from high authority sites and how it can be achieved by adding the links to profile of the account. So, I took a subscription for one month. I got the pack of 30 links as usual and than went on to building links to one of my sites. I noticed something which clicked my mind and guess what? I was confronted with more than 500 links of Angelas high authority site links. I bet most of you guys also want to know about it, right? I have it for you now. You will never have to pay again for those backlinks ever again and you can do link building for your self. I have attached a txt which has the code you need to find angelas backlinks from GOOGLE itself. Let me know if it was useful. Your comments and feed backs are more than welcome.
Angela's link don't work. They never have. It was an urban myth debunked over two years ago. Read here for more info.. http://www.adhocads.com/node/930
I am not saying it does or it does not. I had just posted it so that people could use her links to build backclinks, if they want. Btw, it was a good read.
Buddy, You reverse engineered and took the list. This is your cleverness but you should not share some one else's hard work over this public forum. Any ways, thanks.
Thats one opinion. I think that if the profile is coming from a high PR site it certainly can have some benefit. Why do you think Ezine Articles rank so high despite the fact that they have no PR when they are first published? Because they have some authority from the PR of the main page. I could be wrong but thats how I see it.
You might see it that way, but those of use that do SEO for a living know better. There are several factors that determine where a URL is positioned on a SERP, including on page factors, and pagerank (a quantified measure of your backlinks). It's not unheard of for a page with no backlinks to rank well for non-competitive key phrases with ONLY on page factors. Any articles that rank well for competitive key phrases, however, will do so due to both on page factors as well as backlinks from quality, relevant sites with strong PR. Backlinks from pages with no PR are worthless for SEO purposes. 1 link from on quality, relevant site with PR1 is better than 100 worthless links from Angela's methods.
PR0 pages are only a few links away from PR1 and PR2 links. Angelas social links are not as valuable as some may claim and not valueless either.
The problem is, unless you give them those quality pr1 and pr2 links, no one else will. And if you're going to give any page some backlinks, doesn't it make more sense to give them to your target site?
hmm...okay why not do a experiment on these angelae links. What I am thinking is, that I will write one article in one of the directories with my site's link. I will then Promote the page where my article is with those links and see the effect. It worth some time and effort. If I see my page crawling the SERP than they are of some use, if not than we can simply ignore them. What say?
Feel free. You wouldn't be the first. Hundreds of SEO professionals have already tested it... back in 2007 when the theory first came out.