Google.com has 39 Errors, 2 warnings

Discussion in 'Google' started by russianzio, Sep 23, 2009.

  1. #1
    As appears on validator.w3.org Google front page has multiple script mistakes. What are those errors? Any professional script writers, can you explaine? Do i have to believe Google has failed in their codes?
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2009
    russianzio, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  2. eLeSlash

    eLeSlash Active Member

    Messages:
    1,233
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #2
    I can tell you one thing , google does not need seo !
     
    eLeSlash, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  3. sawz

    sawz Prominent Member

    Messages:
    8,225
    Likes Received:
    808
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #3
    is that going to lessen the value of google.com
    who cares. if they want sloppy let em have it. ;)
     
    sawz, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  4. parky

    parky Peon

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I hear alot of talk about sites need to pass html validation checks to score high in the serps.

    If you check most sites at the no 1 spot they have loads of validation errors.
     
    parky, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  5. angilina

    angilina Notable Member

    Messages:
    7,824
    Likes Received:
    186
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #5
    W3C validated pages are good as this validation helps avoid browser compatibility and other issues. But W3C validation do not directly have any affects on SERPs.

    There are many situations where a site will work perfectly but will show errors at W3C just like Google. W3C is a good thing to consider but we should not worry about it much.
     
    angilina, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  6. webcosmo

    webcosmo Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,840
    Likes Received:
    153
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    255
    #6
    lol thats funny. however Google can afford care less I guess:)
     
    webcosmo, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  7. tattoos

    tattoos Prominent Member

    Messages:
    1,903
    Likes Received:
    150
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    335
    #7
    tattoos, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  8. Maritoni

    Maritoni Peon

    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    You need me to fix it?

    Give me a minute - I'll get right on it.
    .. just need to ssh to the google.com server and ...
     
    Maritoni, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  9. John.

    John. Active Member

    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #9
    That's pretty funny stuff. Just shows you that you need not be perfect to be the best.. Or does it?
     
    John., Sep 23, 2009 IP
  10. AirForce1

    AirForce1 Peon

    Messages:
    1,325
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    This is not weird. w3.org does offer a standard on an ideal site. But I believe no one would trust that a site without 1 error or warning would naturally appear on the top of SERP. :)
     
    AirForce1, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  11. russianzio

    russianzio Peon

    Messages:
    630
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    russianzio, Sep 23, 2009 IP
  12. Jectillplum

    Jectillplum Peon

    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    I don't thinks Google has to tack care about it's.
     
    Jectillplum, Sep 24, 2009 IP
  13. geoiss2004

    geoiss2004 Guest

    Messages:
    1,454
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    google are setting an absolute crap example for the W3C. as the biggest internet company in the world, they REALLY should be setting standards.
     
    geoiss2004, Sep 24, 2009 IP
  14. geoiss2004

    geoiss2004 Guest

    Messages:
    1,454
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    very interesting, but i'm not sure he can use "most pages dont validate... so neither does ours" as an excuse, shocking :O

    i also understand that validation can sometimes put a block on accessibility, but it can always be overcome. he even admits it. i would also like to see a slight preference given to sites that validate as clearly, these have been built more professionally, and this should be awarded.
     
    geoiss2004, Sep 24, 2009 IP
  15. russianzio

    russianzio Peon

    Messages:
    630
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    They are setting standards not to follow the rules...
     
    russianzio, Sep 26, 2009 IP
  16. Hoster1

    Hoster1 Peon

    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    W3C standards are a joke. It is impossible to maintain a good-looking, very dynamic Website and adhere to all standards. It's just impossible.
     
    Hoster1, Sep 26, 2009 IP
  17. markov

    markov Peon

    Messages:
    3,010
    Likes Received:
    37
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    If Google wants to set standards, then it should definitely follow all the standards including W3C validation.
     
    markov, Sep 26, 2009 IP
  18. linkfrommysite

    linkfrommysite Peon

    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    You'll find that google has it own validation method ...
    Google has their own W3C ... called W3G .. LOL ..
     
    linkfrommysite, Sep 26, 2009 IP
  19. geoiss2004

    geoiss2004 Guest

    Messages:
    1,454
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    That's the most idiotic thing I've ever read!
     
    geoiss2004, Sep 27, 2009 IP
  20. geoiss2004

    geoiss2004 Guest

    Messages:
    1,454
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    this is also an idiotic comment.

    unfortunately most of the people on this forum know very little about the technical aspects of the web. standards are there for the good of unifying things, which is MUCH needed!
     
    geoiss2004, Sep 27, 2009 IP