the problem with replying to you is that I don't need facts to debunk your arguments...the reason being that you never present any facts...you never present any credible sources. I don't need to present anything to prove that, you do it yourself.
Haha; that's ridiculous... I'm still waiting for you to point out a post... Remember my last post: I'm waiting... Instead of just posting an opinion, or trying to put someone else down... Why not backup what you said, and find a post where I provided false information... You still never answered my question... How old are you?
In the "Tony Snow" thread you just posted: I'm still waiting for you to point out some threads where I've provided false information, and presented them as facts... Otherwise, going by your system, you're posts have no weight.. Right?
Love to....in this post: you said 51%...where is the source? You provided no source, what you provided is merely your opinion, which is what several of us have called you out on. You never present a source to back up your data, hence, you never have any proof...now go read your own post, here is the link: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=4163033&postcount=39 don't recall you ever asking, but I am 27 you just lost $10...you can send it to my paypal account if you like... why are you trying to bring in another thread? Also, go read your own thread that I provided the link to above. You have presented information with no source to back it up, and you are presenting it as fact, therefore, your post has no weight since you have no source. As far as the Tony Snow thread, I will go over this again, because you seemed to have missed the point. In this post: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=4164039&postcount=16 you have taken two DIFFERENT press releases and combined them together to fit your agenda. When Tony Snow says: he was referring to the something at the beginning of the second press briefing in question. He was NOT referring to the previous press release. I pointed this out in this post: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=4164160&postcount=17 and in your next post: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=4164204&postcount=18 you clearly didn't debate my response. Instead, you admitted that you said: I guess I should have been more specific and said that I wanted a credible source, and not one that you made up to fit your agenda.
You don't believe that 51% of something is a majority? If you need a source to understand a simple term: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority ... I guess I gave you too much credit... Should I start citing all my words over 1 syllable? I honestly should cite the word majority? If you're really 26, act like it... So now you're changing definitions and intended meanings to defend the administration? Wake up man, do you really understand what you're arguing for?
I never debated that 51% was a majority...what I asked for was your source that the majority of americans disagree....you have yet to provide that source, yet you claimed it here: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=4158054&postcount=36 proof you don't read posts as well...I just stated I was 27, not 26... I'm not changing definitions, I am merely pointing out that what you did was cut and paste from two different press briefings to fit your agenda....please show me where I have changed a definition...please.
So now now you're changing the definition of definition to fit your agenda? I showed you two parts of press conferences where he contradicted himself... that same contradiction has been pointed out on the daily show and numerous other news channels.. how about you go tell them that they're all lying... Whoa, you just admitted it! (ps, i snipped that in the middle of a line, like you do, because you have no clue how to debate)
no, what you showed were two DIFFERENT press conferences that were similar, but not the same...again, like I have already asked, please go read the press conferences...nevermind, I will do the work for you:from the first press briefing (of which you quoted a part): and from the second: If you were to read the whole thing, as I have already pointed out TWICE now, what you will see Mr. Snow is pointing out that the Political Office would have knowledge, even when this is performance based. Does that make it clear, or do once again I need to recommend to you to go read BOTH press briefings in their entirety so that you better understand? now you'e learning ...but please show me where I have changed a definition. I would like to know: 1. What word's definition have I changed. 2. What is the definition. 3. The post where I did such a thing.
apparently its about tarpon changing the subject so he doesn't have to give an answer...just like AGS and gwhirled.