GTech wants me to waste my time and open his mind for him. If you are so sure as to what happened you will do your own homework just like we do to get to the facts. I agree with Yo-yo, just as you are asking us for facts we are asking you to provide us proof as well. I do not need to prove to you anything, it is your duty to prove to yourself assuming you are opinionated and idealistic.
GTech, you point out the incorrect spelling of the word "genius". Then, in the same post, you use the word "rediculous". How ridiculous is that?
Ok, mayby it was, still it have no foundation. BTW.. I can translate what you said in swedish. You said: "I have viking". Do you mean that I have a viking dick or what?
It was simply an opportunity for you to stand behind something you spend so much time trying to convince others of. Me personally, I don't need to start posts to convince others of false information. Better men and women than you or the likes of nutjobs like Alex Jones and other book profiteers have already done so. The NIST alone, with some 200 staff reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than one thousand people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they collapsed. Far more than any of these nutjob conspiracy theorists trying to hawk a book and make a buck of young angry white males with low IQs. Unlike yo-yo's post, which set to confine information by defining the question, I've held an open door for the three of you. Pick *anything* from the video, put forth your argument from any information you choose and I'll debate it. I suppose the problem is, you guys are used to nothing more than the lazy approach of gathering up a few hundred "gotcha" questions and using a question to put the burden of "proof" on everyone else. That's lazy. Can't take 15-20 minutes to put forth an argument. If you are not willing to accept the challenge, I have no problem with it. Yo-yo was all confident he had it going on at first, but after debunking the rediculous "molten steel" theory, everyone suddenly lost interest in a real debate. To that, I'm flattered the rest of you suddenly clammed up and lost your backbone. Maybe if you guys spent some time questioning what you use to form your opinions as much as you suggest others should with "open minds," you'd see how rediculous the nonsense is. But you don't want to. Even when outright lies are proven, you willfully choose to close your mind while demanding that others open theirs.
No gtech... nobody else is willing to waist time playing your silly games (similar to wills stupid conspiracy poll) I'm through as well.. until your ready to play your own game.
Asking someone to spell the name they refer you as isn't asking too much. "While I normally don't care about typos or misspellings" Good catch though! I'll let you have that one, big boy
I didn't think you were man enough to stand behind and debate your position. But I'm glad I made the effort to give you the opportunity to do so. And even more glad after round one, you are bowing out. What a shame, you can't even support the conspiracy theories of the book profiteers whose conspiracies you try to convince others to believe in. That's pretty sad!
Man you keep wasting people's time with this ridiculous arguments that keep clouding the purpose of my posts. If I suggested something it was to make people see all sides of a story, for you to be such a bone head and start sturring things up with your supposed arguments its plain a waste of my time . You are set in your ways of thinking and so am I. You believe that the US government and the Bush administration is perfect and you believe blindly to all things you see on TV, I do questions everything, it is my right to do so and my obligation as a concerned US citizen, I feel that my rights are being violated as a result of certain people in this administration and brainwashed supporters of it like yourself. Numerous times you come across as an egocentric person discredeting everyones point of you, specifically mine and Yo-yo's. Everything is relative. You may believe what you believe and I will believe what I believe. You can say "You are either with us or against us" as you seem to share the same principle. I say you can keep thinking that way and in due time may the truth hit you in the face. (of course in your view the same may apply to me) Peace.
Have to agree. Bluster without substance does not a debate or discussion make. There are dozens of highly informative and very well researched websites with verifiable references. Considering the nature of the allegations that 911 was, as I describe it, a 'put up job', or a 'conspiracy' if you prefer, it is unlikely official commissions or investigations will be forthcoming with anything that deviates from the Official Line. As an example, the prime suspect for 911 was Usama Bin Laden. On September 20th, 26 members of the Bin Laden family were allowed to leave the US. The 911 Commission carefully constructs the wording of the questions they will answer: Three questions have arisen with respect to the departure of Saudi nationals from the United States in the immediate aftermath of 9/11: (1) Did any flights of Saudi nationals take place before national airspace reopened on September 13, 2001? (2) Was there any political intervention to facilitate the departure of Saudi nationals? (3) Did the FBI screen Saudi nationals thoroughly before their departure? WTF?! 26 members of the prime suspect's family want to leave simultaneously? 10 days after the twin towers collapse? The questions should have been; (2) Why was there no political intervention to prevent the departure of Saudi nationals? (3) Why did the FBI let them go? A commission is only as good as the questions they choose to ask and if the outcome has been pre-ordained then no amount of 'investigation' will alter the conclusion. People have been launched into the justice-free-zone* and neverending 'blackhole' that is Guantanamo Bay on far more tenuous links to 'terrorism' than the immediate Bin Laden family who were allowed to leave just 10 days after 911. *Addendum: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense." Link
Yeah, yeah, yeah, discerning points of view, blah blah blah. Willfully supporting and putting forth blatant falsehoods is not "another side of the story." No one is taking away your right to believe in shoddy, non-existence evidence. I simply challenged you to stand behind it. Apparently you are willing to put forth effort to respond to a post, but not make an argument with the things you assert. I can't imagine why The truth is already on my side. I challenged you and two others to bring your strongest points from the video for a debate. After round one, everyone ducks their tail and runs. Too much effort? A lot less than you put forth in your last post. If you change your mind and decide you are *really* open minded and want to discuss, let me know. If you can't stand behind your beliefs, then perhaps it's time to move on dot org.
You are more than welcome to take the place of those choose to duck and run. I extend the same offer to you.