I would rather live in a Zoo

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by anthonycea, May 22, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #121
    anthonycea, May 26, 2004 IP
  2. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #122
    I'm not sure how much more clear Google's disclosure could be:

    http://toolbar.google.com/privacy.html

    As far as Google not being allowed to make backups of their gmail servers in California, it would also mean Yahoo mail would fall under the same laws since they are also based in California.

    I bet Microsoft would love to see something so stupid pushed through by lawmakers (as long as it does not apply to Washington of course). :) I would bet money that it will never become a California law though.
     
    digitalpoint, May 26, 2004 IP
  3. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #123
    You should read the whole article, or at least not focus on a single out of context quote.

    The concern is not with spyware being struck down, rather a concern of poorly written laws. This forum is much more "spyware" than the Google toolbar. Not only does it know your browsing habits within the forum, it knows some personally identifiable information about you. The Google toolbar on the other hand, does not send anything to Google other than the URL you are at.
     
    digitalpoint, May 26, 2004 IP
  4. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #124
    We better have the Senator's office look at you Shawn, have you seen the page from his office.

    You are not transfering infromation to a third party. I have agreed to let you use my information in this forum.

    You are not a mass media business subject to regulations like Google is.

    Can you answer the question on why Google's lead lawyer is worried about spyware laws, could it make their business worthless in one day?
     
    anthonycea, May 26, 2004 IP
  5. compar

    compar Peon

    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    169
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #125
    Lawyer are concerned about everything. Certainly Google is collecting information as part of their business model. A good lawyer would be concerned about people with your level of paranoia influencing the law maker for no good reason. This doesn't make what Google is doing "Spyware".

    Spying is always covert. It appears to me that Google is very upfront about what they are doing. The beta release of Gmail was accompanied by a huge publicity campaign and national media coverage. That isn't how spies normally work.
     
    compar, May 26, 2004 IP
  6. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #126
    The Google toolbar is a self updating spyware tool, did you read the web page from Mike Healan that I originally linked you to? SEE LINK IN POST #58 right here on DIGITAL POINT Forums folks.

    It records the each search you make, what search results you clicked on and follows you from web page to web page while enabled to show Page Rank. That is why Google hypes up Page Rank as something of Value, to fool folks into using the enabled tool bar so they can record their every move online. You need to read the toolbar privacy policy closer.
     
    anthonycea, May 26, 2004 IP
  7. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #127
    No it doesn't. The toolbar tells Google what page you are on, but it does not report to them searches you made or what search results you clicked on.

    That I can tell you as a fact... open up a packet sniffer and you can see exactly what it's sending to Google (searches and clicks are not part of it). Whatever "expert" told you that has no idea what they are talking about.

    Maybe he says it reports searches because it reports the URL, which *has* the search parameters within it, but Google has access to their own web logs. So they can see what people search for even if they don't have the toolbar installed.
     
    digitalpoint, May 26, 2004 IP
  8. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #128
    So you are admitting that the toolbar enables Google to follow you around the internet? You say it tells them which pages you are on, is that not telling them what you clicked on?
     
    anthonycea, May 26, 2004 IP
  9. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #129
    Correct, although it's not really an admission, because I never said it was otherwise. If you enable the Google toolbar, Google would be able to know what URL you are at. Which of course is clearly stated in their privacy policy:

    http://toolbar.google.com/faq.html#privacy

    Also, it does not request PageRank for secure sites (https), nor for any URL with a ? in it (so actually it doesn't request if for pages with search parameters within it):

    http://toolbar.google.com/faq.html#pagerank_no_display

    ...all of which is easily verifiable with a packet sniffer.

    URLs you visit are not necessarily ones you click on BTW. Could be bookmarks or typed by hand for example.

    I still have yet to see you substantiate any of your previous claims though:

    • Google's business is based around data they collect with the toolbar
    • Google alters AdSense based on their browsing habits
     
    digitalpoint, May 26, 2004 IP
  10. compar

    compar Peon

    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    169
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #130
    But Anthony. So fucking what? Everyone with an ecommerce web site is running some kind of tracking software that tells them where each visitor comes from and what they do once they reach your web site.

    What is your conspiracy theory about Google? How are they misusing this information? What harm are they doing to us?

    Let's have some actual cases here. Quit all the bullshit innuendos. Show us how anyone has been damaged. Show us how the information is being misused.

    We are trying to give you a chance to make your point, but you just continue to find Google guilty without ever letting them come to trial. You're the lawyer for the prosecution. Now make your case. Show me the beef! Show me the money?
     
    compar, May 26, 2004 IP
  11. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #131
    Shawn, did you read Mike Healans commentary on the auto updater feature of the toolbar in the link in post 58? it is the spywareinfo link on that page.

    If Google or Alexa's business is not based on the information collected, can you give a reason on why they collect it? Is it for the good of mankind? Why do companies report your credit rating, why do banks check your credit score before giving you a loan.

    Google has admitted that they seek to use this information to target more relevant ads to web surfers through the ADSENSE program. They will eventually get better if allowed to do keystroke tracking, if they are allowed to do this they can run pop ups at you while you are typing, is that where you want the internet to go?
     
    anthonycea, May 26, 2004 IP
  12. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #132
    Yep... I don't see any problem with Google auto-updating the toolbar when a new version comes out. That doesn't make it spyware.


    Well first of all, I still haven't seen anything that actually shows Google is mining the URL data, but even if they did... And a quote from the article you point to: "Unlike other toolbars, this information gathering is used only to make Google a better, more accurate search engine, not to target advertisements at the user."

    To be honest, in Google's case, I think it *would* be for the good of mankind as opposed to them building a master profile database to maliciously exploit users or sell their info. Maybe they want to make ads or search results more relevant for the end user. personally, I wish they would hurry up and DO that. It would be a reason for me to actually install the Google toolbar.


    Who did they admit that to? You personally?

    Truthfully, this whole thread is silly (although very entertaining). Everyone in the world knows the Google toolbar can report URLs (there is no way around that if you want to use the PageRank function). So your stance of being the savior to the Internet and saving people from big brother (Google), really is funny. Although this thread really does make me smile sometimes... which is why I enjoy participating in it.
     
    digitalpoint, May 26, 2004 IP
  13. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #133
    Bob you keep asking for more, well when I give you some information, do you really look at it or are you here to shake my tree, you know Bob one day a big apple is going to plunk you right on the head.

    http://www.searchwars.squarespace.com/display/ShowJournal?moduleId=25592

    Look at the above page and really read the links this time instead of just asking more questions, maybe you can explain some of the things you learned by reading true research. I did not make these stories up, I am simply a messanger.

    Do you know that Jeff Bezos the Chairman of Amazon is a early shareholder in Google, he bought a large amount of shares for 6 cents a share. Do you know that Amazon owns Alexa? Do you know that the Alexa toolbar is considered spyware, but for some reason the Google toolbar does collect as much or more information and it updates itself without users knowledge. See the link in post #58 on the page you will see a link to spywareinfo, Mike Healan the wrtiter talks about the Google toolbar, NOTE, the only thing I agree with him on is the autoupdater part of the article. He is in error on the other facts, as he is hedging for some reason or does not know the whole story.
     
    anthonycea, May 26, 2004 IP
  14. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #134
    Big deal... Microsoft owns Apple stock, that doesn't mean Windows gets secretly installed on Macintosh computers.

    I own stock in my competitors companies in some cases. It's about business, not secret agendas.
     
    digitalpoint, May 26, 2004 IP
  15. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #135
    "Unlike other toolbars, this information gathering is used only to make Google a better, more accurate search engine, not to target advertisements at the user." Quote from Mike Healan's article above.

    That is a false statement, he does not really know anything about this or he would not have made this statement, the guy's is a spyware expert. Like I said he is hedging a bit, the only fact I agree with him on is the unauthorized auto updating of the Google toolbar without users permisssion or knowledge.
     
    anthonycea, May 26, 2004 IP
  16. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #136
    Well, do you have any evidence to contradict him? Are you an industry toolbar expert? What makes your claims more valid than his?
     
    digitalpoint, May 26, 2004 IP
  17. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #137
    Like I said he is in error, I did state that on my web page also, but you brought it up again so I mention that he is in error. He is hedging like I told you Shawn.
     
    anthonycea, May 26, 2004 IP
  18. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #138
    digitalpoint, May 26, 2004 IP
  19. compar

    compar Peon

    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    169
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #139
    Anthony,

    You even disagree with the people you are trying to use to support your point. If they say "A" that supports you, you quote them, but if they also say "B", "C" & "D" that refutes your contention then you and you alone decide that they are uninformed.

    Apparently you are right and the whole worlds is misinformed.

    Come on Anthony, give us a break. You have no evidence of Google misusing any information they may or may not have gathered. Your case is being laughed out of court.

    I will grant you this. It behoves us to be aware and constantly vigilant about anyone or anybody who is collecting information about us. I personally worry about the Government and in your country the FBI and CIA and other agencies we don't even know about.

    But you have absolutely no evidence of any wrong doing on Google's part. That doesn't mean we shouldn't what them, but it does mean that you are spreading a lot of accusations and and innuendos today that are totally unsubstantiated and unsupported. You haven't got one iota of evidence. Your case would never even make it to a court of law. They would throw you in jail for malicous prosecution.
     
    compar, May 26, 2004 IP
  20. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #140
    One thing I do agree with is that it wouldn't be terribly difficult for Google to have an option to not auto-install updates. But IMO that does not make them a "bad" company that is out to spy on the world.

    But then again, I don't know much about their toolbar/PR backend. There may be technical reasons that a bunch of out of synch toolbar versions is not an option. And since I don't know the facts, I can't really judge.
     
    digitalpoint, May 26, 2004 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.