You're not the only one. Alot of it I 'think' has to do with so many people like his ideas but simply think it's 'far' out there. Too good to be true. The guy in question last night though is one of those who doesn't know anything about politics, short of a few minutes he hears on the radio. He couldn't list one thing about Paul he didn't like. When I asked him why his response was to change the discussion away from politics 'I don't want to talk politics' or something like that. Which is odd as he usual does and was that night. As people start to understand his message it appears many are going from seeing him as a nut to supporting him. Still no answer? BTW your reapeated quote comes from questioning 'Williams' who according to guerilla is in the grassroots which you do realise the campaign does not control do you not? Kind of destroys the quote you are quoting, but that would be if you use logic. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0046,ladd2,19934,6.html Your own google search, the first result is not from RP or RP supporters. In fact it's 'Don Black' supporting Bush in a protest and shock voting for him. Still so difficult for you to understand everyone will draw bad apples, especially when somone is for the full rights of the constitution for all. I don't believe even you are that much of an idiot, I do however see you just like the Rush's of the US are trying anything and everything to make sure Paul does not get the nomination. You know the guy who has no chance, that you fear so much.
So many personal attacks in one post. Sort of reminds me of this one from the article: I thought this one was rather illuminating. A sharp contrast between blacks, and terrorists: A disturbing trend, over the years. Interesting that some don't question it.
Personal attack? Where might I ask? Nothing in my post is near a personal attack, you would be the king of that. So still no answer, should have figured. --edit You forgot to bold Sure appears to me he's sticking up for a 'race' while you are trying to stick up for those committing crimes by making it a racist issue. Normally you would be the other way around and calling anyone who questioned such a statement 'terrorist supporters' Thanks for the hardcore laugh Gtech, seriously you made my day.
Does this mean that you are going to support Ron Paul or are you going to still be in the closet regarding your true political colors? Can you tell us with exception of anti-Semitics, what other part of fascism ideology you don't agree with?
That's great and all but where is Bush saying something about his support from such groups? Not simply because someone is going to run for office? You can find quote after quote of RP saying even better things, trying not to make us a collective group which gets rid of 'racism' completely on the purest level. But you know, that denial and all.
Wow so many tiny little known press organizations, normally one would give absolutely no credit to 'you usually would not if anyone linked to such a page' but now it's total truth. Yet again if he has no support, why do you fear him? Why do you not question anyone else?
If anyone is in denial Gtech that would be you? Oh my god when I thought someone could not get more delusional. Can not answer a simple question, but can hunt for a few quotes around the web. Ghee I wonder how many quotes and supporters could be found for your guy. Ohyeah so far I only quoted the facts that he let a rapist out 'illegally' who then went to rape and kill.
http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover.html Who else did he support? Did Bush come out against the support? Don't be a hypocrite, here is your chance. Bash Bush now for the same support RP is getting. I know you wont, you'll try to twist, support however is support.
So in other words you can not answer anything, you can simply hunt for a few quotes to discredit a guy who 'has not chance' yet he's the focus of your obsession to trash. Anyone want to play the game with another candidate, perhaps one that Gtech supports. Something tells me one could find tons of off beat sources to claim crap of him.
May 24, 1996 Congress Daily article: There is, of course, a sense of sweet irony in those last two words of his quote.
Yet again Gtech one is for 'support' one is for 'running for office' are you blind that you do not see the difference? It has already been proven good old Bush had support from such sides as well, where is his denouncing them? Is this the best you can do, pretty fng weak to say the least.
It is a simple question, why can't you answer it? Is it because there is nothing else that you disagree with and that is the reason you think there is no need to answer?
Gtech you're the 'messenger' in here, using quotes from no name sources. Not a 'peep' coming from you. There have also been no personal attacks.. I'll take it as you have no point or answer, and well take this as a personal attack but are simply the 'joke' we have come to know. Posting quote after quote, yet shows he's a hypocrite as his own guy 'Bush' had the same support but that was ok.