I agree, but you must admit that there was little from people/companies like architects, construction companies, civil engineers etc. which were directly involved in the planning and building of the two towers. Strange is also that suddenly experts, as named above, came not into consideration in researching the details of the cause, then the FBI and other non qualified departments, to speak their points of findings.
I found one site that claimed the support beams were made of concrete, not steel. I imagine the engineers and builders are keeping quiet so as not to be embarrased after claiming the buildings could survive an airplane impact. Actually they did survive the impact and I was quite impressed, but you never know, contracters have been known to cut corners and that may just have been the case.
That's then even more strange if it is as you say, because that would mean that the govt, FBI are covering the shortcomings of the people involved in the construction.
Forget the picture, there's plenty of firsthand testimony. There wouldn't be any discrepencies about molten steel perhaps if they hadn't rushed away all the evidence. .
You said to answer the molten metal theory, then you post a picture, now you say forget it? First hand testimony in a high stress situation means nothing, if my wife is running late for work her brain shuts off and she can't even find her keys, I can't imagine what the people that were there went through.
That's the smartest thing I've ever heard you say. People don't research anything, they don't question anything, they dismiss everything besides what the government told them as a "conspiracy theory" (although I already proved the gov's claims are just as much a conspiracy theory by the very definition of the words). I'm glad we're getting somewhere here Roman.
Peter Tully, president of Tully Construction, Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Incorporated. Leslie Robertson, the chief structural engineer for the Twin Towers Joe "Toolie" O'Toole, a Bronx firefighter Greg Fuchek, vice president of sales for LinksPoint, Inc. You're telling me all these people's claims of molten steel mean nothing because of stress? . The president of a company that does NOTHING BUT blow up buildings is too stressed out cleaning up that he can't tell what molten steel is? REAL BELIEVABLE
OK, molten steel, what does the explosives that are used for demolitioning do? Burn through or cut the supports. The charges ignite in a fraction of a second, so how could they produce mass quantities of molten steel? I'll agree with you that there are things we don't know about but the governments truth IMHO is a lot closer to the real truth than what you are proposing.
This has been explained in my quotes on the last 5 or so pages of this thread. It's also clearly explained in the 2nd article I posted and partially in the first article. I'm not going to re quote and paste everything thats already right there in front of you. Go back and read. The article is long but well worth the read, especially if you want to have an open mind and discuss things EDIT: Start here
The thermite could never produce significant quantities of molten steel and again you bring me back to that picture so read this: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=521387#post521387
For those of you that think a huge, hot, fire was raging inside the crash hole of the buildings: http://italy.indymedia.org/uploads/2005/04/woman-waving-close.avi How about a woman waving from inside the actual crash hole? Going to have a hard time explaining how a woman can wave from the fire hot enough to collapse 110 story buildings.
Fire can be centralized and with the amazing invention of fireproofing you can have a raging fire inches away and feel no heat. Dont' you watch infomercials? Besides, it may not have been fire, gravity is a pretty stong force.
This made me think of something I've read a lot about in the history books. If people were openly using the word, "jews" and not the word "arabs", wouldn't there be an outcry? Jim, I realise you did not use the word "arab". It simply reminded me of a time in recent history when a group seized power of a country, gradually eroded, then severely limited, freedoms, and thereafter suspended civil liberties and initiated martial law based on a self-inflicted 'attack'. Inciting hatred based on racial grounds to further their own aims and fund their plans for war was all part of the package, as was going to war on a pretext.
Since it seems many of you don't have the patience to read, here's a nice video explaining all the problems with the 9/11 "official story" http://www.reopen911.org/video/painful_deceptions-an_analysis_of_the_911_attack_part1.wmv
Here we have the construction manager of WTC saying how the buildings should have EASILY survived MULTIPLE plains hitting it! http://freepressinternational.com/wtc_manager.wmv
Video explaining WTC 7 building: http://www.reopen911.org/video/painful_deceptions-an_analysis_of_the_911_attack_part2.wmv It also covers how the fires were at the BOTTOM floors of the building, but the video clearly shows the very top penthouse CRUMBLE BEFORE THE REST of the building... hmmm... very interesting isn't it
I stopped having the patience to read when I've realized that most of the theories put out are completely unfounded and a waste of time. If there was something that I believed was new and had evidence, sure. But you can spend your whole life reading them all and they are all different and have one thing in common: no evidence that they are actually solid enough to consider changing history over