Why still got Americans like George W Bush?

No its not a fact, its an opinion.

 

if people are dying today in afghan and iraq its not because bush or someone else has mad about killing some people. its because the terrorists has no sense of humanity and killed thousands by hitting the plane on the twin tower and do not forget saddam's killings. to stop a million people die, it might be necessary to kill a thousand. u wont stop taking medicines when u get influenza saying u cant kill the bacterias, will u? the terrorists are plague to humanity and should be killed at any cost. and their supporters must also be killed.

its the fruit of what they saw that they r reaping now.

 

I'm not a Bush supporter.

Your assumption just goes to show what a moron you are!

 

How do you feel about Dick?

 

ROFFLMMFAO @ Hodged BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

 

These threads are so silly.

What is actually going to be achieved by discussing this kind of thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over.................

It gets *really* old *really* quickly.

Seriously, go to the index of the forum and read the title...
I'll even post it here if you like...

I could be wrong, but last time I checked, Internet Marketing and search engines don't really have a lot to do with George Bush or really politics in any way shape or form.

I for one am sick and tired of reading these pointless threads full of arguments and repetitive posts on DP.

I thought all that had stopped when AC left (And for a while, believe it or not - it did)...

I certianly have opinions that I would *love* to voice on here, but I don't. Because this is a forum about webmaster matters (And the odd bit of general chat crap too )

So, you want to chat politics, here are a list of suggestions for you - I'm sure they will be a much better place to troll and provoke a reaction......

www.politicsforum.org/
www.politicsforum.co.uk/
www.politicsforum.com/
www.debatepolitics.com/
www.cleveland.com/forums/politics/
www.nj.com/forums/politics/
www.pennlive.com/forums/politics/
www.al.com/forums/politics/
www.npboards.com/
www.newpoliticsforum.org/
www.itsallpolitics.com/
www.masslive.com/forums/politics/
etc etc........

Ok, so have we now established that there are forums out there for you to talk about this kind of stuff on?

I'll just mention the title of this forum one more time incase anyone missed the key points in there...

Plllllleeeeeeeeaaaaaasssssseeeee can you all stop chatting about this shit on DP...

Thanks.

 

It's a fact:

survey published in The Lancet on 29 October 2004 estimated the casualties of the 2003 invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq to be 98,000 (95% confidence interval: 8000 to 194000) more than would have been expected without the invasion, although there are many caveats (explained below). To date, this is has been the only serious scientific attempt to estimate the excess mortality as a result of the invasion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_study

 

Deaths during an act of war or conflict are not considered murder. If this was the case then every US president (and most World leaders) would be considered murderers. Not to mention so many police officers and soldiers. Your premise is also ridiculous as you are basically saying if the military action created fewer deaths than Saddam it wouldn't be murder but once you pass the average, it suddenly is (which is a weird way to value human life)

Like I said its a matter of opinion on whether deaths in war should be considered murder.

My intention is not to argue single points...Especially since you don't even know my own personal opinion on the Iraq war.

My point is that just because someones opinion differs from yours, that doesn't make them "stupid". You calling all of the US stupid exposed you as ignorant fromt he start of this thread.

 

"A survey estimated..."

Now that sounds like a cold hard fact!

 

There is no link between terrorists and Iraq BEFORE Iraq War.

Iraq's ties to Al Qaeda, and the September 11, 2001 attacks were frequently implied but no evidence was ever put forward.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Iraq_War

 

Did you, or do you consider Hitler as murderer?

 

Ummm...Do you even read my posts?

 

www.politics.ws
www.debatepolitics.com
www.dailyjolt.com/forum/politics/
www.masslive.com/forums/politics/
boards.swirve.com/board.cgi?boardset=utopia&boardid=politics
www.d12world.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=89
www.canadiancontent.net/forums/forum-32.html
www.oregonlive.com/forums/undecidedvoters/
www.al.com/forums/alabamapolitics/

There are a few out there...

 

WRONG! It has been proven that Saddam was indeed the founder of Al-Qaeda. And Saddam's sons actually piloted a few of the planes that were used in the Sept. 11th attacks.

Get your info straight before posting, please!

 

Ops sorry. I missed your last part about the 'stupid' wording. Sorry about that. I have no comment on that.

 

webstop - If you truly can't see the difference between Hitler and George Bush, I for one am truly glad you aren't one of us "stupid americans"

 

Can you show me the link of your information? I would want to say sorry to you if you can prove me!

 

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=discuss+politics
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=politics+forum
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=anti+war
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=pro+war
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=go+somewhere+else+to+discuss+politics

 

Be honest now...Would you actually beleive anything in any link provided to you? These threads are full of links here and it changes nothing.

You have your own opinion and others have theirs. I always think its weird when I meet people that have all the "facts" and everyone else is stupid.

 

They both:
1. Elected by democracy
2. Launch the war.

And even got old family business link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html