http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918 In other words, the shells that contained the chemical WMD were corroded, but the contents of the shells could be taken and introduced into newer shells or anything else, and be used. I've posted this before in response to ferret, so it's not that he isn't aware...
Only in an alex jones controlled mind. Look! No one could address the facts! There's a shocker And to think, you guys could have been defense attorneys for saddam!
they don't have too, but they will resort to any way to kill a mass of people...and you will do anything you can to support that.
you could take your brain, add it to ferrets, and become dumber...but then, that is still way below the average...
Administration Sources that we did not find Weapons of Mass Destruction; September 10, 2006; Interview with Dick Cheney on Meet the Press 2nd Example (among many) http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html In this example we find that then members of Congress, Santorum and Hoekstra were claiming that the US found WMD. The Fox article quotes a member of the Defense Department who gives an official administration response The point is that there can all sorts of claims about everything and anything including articles, comments, findings etc. The administration has acknowledged that what was found in no way represents what we then thought of as WMD and what was found in no way represents that which was being described as the reasons to go to war.
Strawman argument, EP. No one is making a claim that we found all that the Clinton administration said were there. *Some* were found. Sources indicate such. You make a good point too. The administration doesn't focus on the issue in the least bit and from their perspective, the WMD that Tenet and the former Clinton administration also said were there, was not found. No one claims it was found though, so in essence, it's still a strawman argument. I claim *some* have been found. That is factual. *Some* have been found. To deny that, would be dishonest. I expect dishonesty from some here. I'd like to think you are above that, though. Facts always trump "feelings" and "wishful thinking."
You could start with AGS's "i want the troop back to be safe" then link to his posts where he say's "dumb soldiers" & "5 clowns in exchange for 15" (relating to the hostages taken by Iran).
Nope, I set no conditions. I leave the conditions for you guys as a last resort mechanism. Unfortunately, what you claim I missed is another strawman argument, because I have made no conditional statements. *Some* wmd have been found. That is true. I have documented those and even when you dishonestly tried to make them appear "inert," after I corrected you on such last time, reposted information from WMD experts regarding their content. In it's simplest form, no matter how much you wish WMD had not been found, *some* have been found. Those are documented. I can stand behind them, because they are true. The question is, why others will lie about them, despite the evidence? I suspect a lack of integrity coupled with the usual blind hatred.
So technically WMD's do exist in Iraq. Just not in mass quantities. Case proven, move on to the next issue. What color should I paint the Obelisk in the new Capital of the world?
yeah, but you know AGS will never take a bet that he absolutely knows he will lose...its just not his style.