We are just going to keep on going round in circles unless you actually listen to what I am saying not what you think I am saying. So, Yes whatever GTech. I don't care anymore- you are mental
Not exactly. Not paranoia. This, once again, is a great example of what I continue to assert, that you sweep the issues under the rug. In fact, it started on page nine and I even noted it: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=2274075&postcount=180 So, in essence, I do share some blame, in that early on I identified what you were doing, yet I continued to let you do it. I'll take a little heat for your bad behavior.
Whatever GTech!!! Don't share the blame- take it all!! I'm going to bed now and it's snowing outside!!!! Bye
No, my reaction is laughter. OK, let's spend some time on this. So at first, you were in denial. But I continued to post more and more information that made it impossible for you to continue to lie. So to lessen the effect, you reach for moral equivalence. To reach for moral equivalence is to accept that my position is in fact correct, even though you spent a good deal of time misleading others that it was not correct. It's correct, so therefore you need something equivalent to minimize what you've done. So you come back with a blog post, that looks like it was just made up. It mysteriously states that Christians use a book that call muslims pigs. Work with me here, it gets real good! Then, towards the bottom of the short article posted on a blog, it instructs the reader to "read this story" Your mistake? This is good, I hope you're ready You didn't click on the link! It links directly to the story I first posted about an islamic school in the UK that is doing this. So, either the blog poster was absolutely stoned/drunk when making the post, and mixed the religions up, or someone made this post dishonestly in an attempt to make a quick point on a forum during an actual discussion about it. So now, not only is your source blatantly inaccurate, but because you resorted to moral equivalence, you've admitted that the quran and hadiths refer to muslims as apes and pigs (and they do). I love a good game of chess
Nor did you have a bad word for terrorists. Another failed opportunity? Are you "tarring all soldiers" with the same brush, again? If a soldier is convicted of a crime and has a fair trial (something you like to deny them, but demand for terrorists) and is found guilty, I have no use for them. That holds true for the rapist and it holds true for the traitor currently on trial. What I'm against, is your conviction of soldiers over the past year who had not even had a trial. Did you want to say anything bad about terrorists yet?
gtech you still have not let us know which political party is closest to your views and if you can name one person that we can research that supports your views
Clever old GTech once again misses the point!! I did click on the link, you don't understand the meaning of the blog. It is demonstrating that replacing Muslims calling Jews and Christians apes and pigs with Christians calling Jews and Muslims apes and pigs has a bigger effect due to the negativity towards Islam and muslims.!!! Note on my post it said 'still the same reaction?' Just goes to show that you never read a whole article because if you did you would have read: The mud is on your face!! Not so clever now eh?
You don't need a trial because these criminal ADMITTED to the crime and ACCEPTED guilty plea. You still have not answered. Do you condemn the action of these criminals who raped a teenage girl and murdered her family or are you still cheering them?
Nope, I did re-read for clarity, after I made my post. And I am happy you finally, after almost a page of denial, admit that you were not being truthful and that teachings of islam do reference Jews and Christians as apes and pigs. I guess my question is, why would you chose to lie about it initially? Are you *that* ashamed?
He was convicted. However, I believe you just randomly went out to find such and this is not the same person you were harping on last week. I've asked you to find that post for confirmation, but you've yet to do so. In fact, you have a long history of convicting soldiers under nothing but accusations last year, but we see how you feel about al qaida terrorists in comparison. You either have a reading disability or your browser cache needs to be cleared, as I gave a very specific answer. To which, I note you *still* don't have a bad word for terrorists? Will you ever be saying anything bad about terrorists? And why do you want the US to pull out of Iraq so terrorists can take over?
How strange!!! I don't seem to remember saying that that teachings of islam do reference Jews and Christians as apes and pigs. Hang on a second, Thats because I didn't - Its Just GTech assuming things. I'm not ashamed and I didn't lie because It doesn't say that. Throwing a couple of translations with 'it might refer to jews' does not mean its in the Quran- or anywhere for that matter. Once again, that was a classic GTech, I still can't stop laughing
Actually, when drawing upon moral equivalence as your defense, it's an admission. So now you're back to denial again? You are saying that neither the quran nor the hadith make references to Christians and/or Jews as pigs and apes? Yes, or no?
There are a group of people within the Moslem community that are trying to gain political power within the countries that they reside in. Some of these people have chosen to use Islam as their shortcut to gain popular support and some has chosen to misrepresent Islam to achieve their objectives. There is example of this type in other religions like kahane. Although they do not represent a majority but they are very active and militant and have managed to silence most opposition in their communities. This kind of effect can be seen in most countries if you study the effect of the criminal gangs. Sometimes victims of gang related crimes do not report to the police because of fear yet we know that they don't support these criminals. Don’t forget that some of these people were supported by west to counter soviet expansion in Pakistan Afghanistan and the rest of the Arab world and have gained an unnatural power a lot of these hate preachers are members of Moslem brotherhood of Egypt and they have entered Europe by seeking political asylum and can and should be looked at and jailed if they are preaching hate and violence. I am against their deportation for obvious reasons.. At the same time the voices of moderation within these communities should be assisted and supported. We should also introduce alternative way of thinking within these communities. Again what is annoying me about your post is the way that you attack all these moderate thoughts here and how you try to prove that their moderate version of Islam is wrong and I find this approach so counter productive that I feel it necessary to object to. If you read the Nine Essential Points for Talking About the War on Terrorism in the link that I posted you might get a better understanding of what I am trying to tell you. Now you can answer my questions
Yup lol, I often laugh at GTech and his brainwashed mind. Like he keeps saying if the US pulls out of Iraq the terrorists will take over. Meanwhile the real terrorists in the White House and Pentagon are already planning their next crusade (Iran) in their quest to destroy the Middle East.