Some interesting content on 911 also posted by one of our members at http://www.aacircle.com.au/forums/your-opinion/5974-911-was-predicted.html. Never believe what you read in the media.
Yeh, sometimes these fortune tellers are full of hype, and make statements that can be seen from thousands of different angles. For me, it was more informative listening to the facts of engineers and university professors.
Alex Jones did not predict 9/11. Never believe what you read on alex jone's site. Question those who question reality.
No, but Kennedy did! http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/4198198.html And the crazies put on their tinfoil hats and went nuts!
So your proof here is an interent link in another forum to "Prison Planet" which we all know is probably the most respected source for truth in reporting? I wonder if this Alex Jones really even exists at all.
He does, I've been watching some of his work when I was banned. I started with the terrorstorm film that tesla posted. It was all quite interesting. But it seems that he's just a business man, look at his site infowars.com it's pretty commercial. But if he would be right about the complex 9/11 inside job, he would be a dead guy for sure. It would be 1000 times easier to send a sniper at him than doing the controll demolition stuff without anyone seeing it and make all the demolition agents to shut up. However, the London/Madrid conspiration seemed more possible since it much fewer people. Not that I think it's true, but a smaller conspiracy is more usuall than big ones.
It definitely is the convenient and easier thing to believe. To just blame it on your own government. Alex Jones is a commercial business. He would be dead if what he was saying was true. Therein lies the contradiction. I mean, it really is a difficult burden to truly understand that Islam is a religion dedicated to the destruction of the West, and the return of the Caliphate (which invaded Europe from Spain to Serbia, leading to a UNITED effort to repel the terrorists as ONE united european force i.e. the crusades) regrettfully it takes a religious figure to rally us to again fight the Muslim invaders, this time they use immigration and terrorism. I can only hope the Pope will call Islam what it is. People make a big hoopla about nothing. Like the Downing Street memos. Of course they were planning an invasion in advance! If they weren't, I'd be more upset! 1/3 of America believes Bush was responsible for 9/11. THERE'S THE CONSPIRACY. That so many Americans have been LIED to by MoveOn.org and other liberal whacko groups. The irony is all the real conspiracies are not known by 99% of the public, like Pearl Harbour (US fleet is normally stationed in California, not the exposed position in Hawaii), JFK killed by rogue CIA who were betrayed at bay of pigs (he fired CIA chief Allen Dulles, who headed the investigation into his death, haha ironic) or Patton being assasinated by FDR (because he was complaining about Operation Keelhaul, handing over refugees to be executed by the communists) those all being led by left-wingers. Even I bought into the 9/11 stuff for a few days, until I RESEARCHED and found out 95% of what I was told were lies. There was no missile in the pentagon (it was the wheels of the plane that punctured those holes), there was no explosives in at the WTC (it was the heat that weakend the supports, and lead to the collapse), etc. EVERY SINGLE "mysterious" fact can be logically explained by the planes that hit. If anything there is a left-wing conspiracy to blame what Islamo-fascists did on the ONLY PEOPLE dedicated to fighting them! The conservatives. Bill Clinton actually put US troops ON THE MUSLIM SIDE in Bosnia, where AL QAEDA was "fighting on the same side". Left wingers will always act like Muslims are victims, and that only the "extremists" support Bin Laden. THIS IS BECAUSE LIBERALS ARE ON THE MUSLIM SIDE. I mean, Hugo Chavez held up Noam Chomsky's book! The #1 democrat's best seller, that claims Bush is imperializing on the world, is now the dictator book-of-choice! What next, Ahmadenijad holds up Hilary Clinton's biography? What more do you need? In reality, Islam means "to submit". A muslim is "one who has submitted". Islam's goal is to force the world into submission. Just as Mohammad did when he broke his truce and massacred the Jews at Mecca. Mohammad also commands his followers to LIE to infidels to further Islam. The inconvenient truth is there is a Islamic movement to destroy the West. I remind you that all the major evil movements have been left wing. Communism which killed 100 million, and National Socialism, is just patriotic Communism. The Nazi's are a leftist organization. They are just "patriotic" socialists! They are both anti-religion. The fact is we face the rise of Islamo-Nazism and a new Caliphate which Osama says will rise in Iraq. Asking for help from "moderate islamo-nazis" is a ridiculous idea. We have to bomb them into submission. Bush is being too nice! Trying to help rebuild the very people who hate us, when this is a MASS movement in Islam, not fringe! Look at Iraq, we depose the Sunni's and now the "liberated" Shiites are the majority attacking us. They hate all non-muslims, just as the Qu'Ran commands. Heck, the official salute in Iran, is the same as the Nazi Salute, and they even do the goose step! As the Muslim Magazine Vox in Bosnia said with a Muslim dressed up in their SS uniform on the beheaded head of a Serbian politician, "welcome to the fourth reich". The muslim green berets call themselves the "1944 Handzar SS division", referring to bosnian muslims who served under Hitler. These are the guys Clinton went in to "protect" on the same side as Al Qaeda.
First of all, before you laugh away the 9/11 truth movement you need to consider that there is an enormous amount of facts that reveal shattering inconsisitencies with the official story. The main thing that turns people away from the 9/11 truth movement is the little "fringe" theories that have no backing at all. Some examples: Laser projected holograms that looked like planes hit the towers, windowless cargo planes hit the towers (even though photos of debris show airline windows ), UFOs did it, missles shooting from the planes to make them explode, etc. Not to mention the horrible pile of crap movie "9/11 In Plane Sight". These foolish theories hurt the rest of the truth campaign. Most people just lump them all together and often point out the hokey theories to discredit the whole thing. So if you really want to dig out some 9/11 truth, then it's required to have a healthy amount of skepticism. I won't elaborate further on what I find to be the truth behind 9/11 or else this post would be too long (and I'm ready for bed soon anyway ). I suggest you check out http://www.st911.org/ for starters.
Some more recent truths have been released. Typically, if a "campaign" must use the word "truth" to describe itself, it's probably a bit fishy.
I am not sure whether this was mentioned before, but here is the "Reopen 9/11": http://www.reopen911.org/ As a Muslim, I of course condemn the perpetrators of this terrorist attack, it is insane, evil and inhuman, and certainly not motivated by any teaching of Islam. - MENJ
Did anyone watch the 911 Cover up video before? I watched all 1:22 of it yesterday and i was utterly shocked at what it told me, but i believe that they do cover up some things, eg the FBI taking the videos away. I dont believe that the 9/11 story the government released or the 9/11 story in the video. It is like propaganda and anti-propaganda material. I dont believe that the government will ever release a story which is true. Rob
Nice made for AdSense Site.. If I was standing right in front of you and punched you in the face, and it was video taped from 3 different angles, by three different people, I have a feeling someone somewhere could convince you of one or all of the following: 1. It did not happen 2. It did happen, but it was not me that punched you in the face 3. It did happen, and it was me that punched you in the face, but it was not really your face that was punched. The whole thing was faked by the a huge government plot to make you look like a wanker. Pretty sill now, eh?
So if you don't like foolish theories that have no backing at all, why are the site you're linking to suggesting that WTC7 was a controlled demolition? I have allready debunked it in the 9/11 evidence thread.
I respect your belief, but I advice you to research these conspiracy theories and question them at least as much as official theories. There's a lot of BS that floats around on internet these days.
WTC7 is the biggest smoking gun of all. That building should not have collapsed as it did, and no matter how much you want to deny it it was a controlled demolition. If it had a large chunk out of it (from being hit by debris as we are told) it should have collapsed off to the side. The f*cker fell clean down into its own footprint.
Actually, it's the easy to debunk and has been time and time again. Is it just that you want to believe it, or have you ever actually questioned those that pretend they are questioning 9/11? How many times do these things have to be debunked before the voice in the head whispers "dude, are you being honest with yourself here?"
Why shouldn't it collapse as it did? Seismographic evidence tells us that there were no major explotions before the collapse. Also, is there any demolition firm that agree on WTC7 beeing a controlled demolition?
LOL of course not! The people controling the media want all the numpteys to believe it fell from being hit by falling debris and a bit of fire. I personally believe the planes were controlled via remote control from WTC7 but that's just my opinion. Oh, unless WTC1 and 2 were hit by highackers that struggled to fly Cessnas managing to fly complex airliners hitting both towers with precision.