View Full Version : One Way Link Building Versus Recipricol Link Building Campaigns
pixel1
Feb 8th 2006, 7:30 pm
There has been alot of debate since Googles last change. I have seen articles saying the recipricol Linking does not have the weight it once did and that Google takes One Way Link Building with more importants. I personally due One Way Link Building Campaigns with good success but always looking for the edge if possible. Is there a real seperation between the two linking options that any one has seen.
Thanks:)
Brad Callen
Feb 8th 2006, 7:55 pm
Yes,
Quality 1 way links are from my experience much better then reciprocal links. Usually you are getting the 1 way link from a better page too, rather then from a reciprocal directory.
This makes a much bigger difference.
Brad
john269
Feb 8th 2006, 10:36 pm
I don't really do much reciprocal linking anymore. I prefer to just do one way linking.
I prefer to be saver than sorry at the end of the day.
kausik
Feb 9th 2006, 8:13 am
Yes offcourse one way links better than recips if they come from themed sites.
DomainMagnate
Feb 9th 2006, 10:49 am
there's a well known theory saying google has a penalty for reciprocal links... and everyone believes it :)
mvhs
Feb 9th 2006, 4:46 pm
So link exchanging isn't such a good idea if you want to increase your PR?
ferret77
Feb 9th 2006, 6:07 pm
there's a well known theory saying google has a penalty for reciprocal links... and everyone believes it
Except for me, because i just traded a bunch of links on a couple sites and there rankings went up, so it doesn't happen 100% of the time
So link exchanging isn't such a good idea if you want to increase your PR?
Reciprical links increase pr
pixel1
Feb 13th 2006, 7:57 pm
I personally don't do link exchanges any more. I find that one way linking seems to a better internet marketing option.
free
Feb 13th 2006, 11:32 pm
I think one way links are better than reciprocal links (of course), however I don't think google penalizes you for reciprocal linking, unless you link to a banned site something like a link farm. my opinion is that one way links carry far more weight than reciprocal links
Sxperm
Mar 1st 2006, 10:23 pm
As everyone knows, one way link is the best way. However, reciprocal is not bad even google may devalued them. Take a look, your site may devalued from Google if you reciprocal with
1. site that not relevant themed to your site.
2. site that banned by search engines.
3. Link farms, Cloaking, Doorway, keywords stuffing, etc.
but if you've reciprocal linked with site that relevant, it's should be pretty good. Most of us cannot pay to place one way links in all good directories, can you? The other ways is built organic links from some webmaster that like your site and link to your site withour asking. :D not happened too much.
Cheers,
Sxperm
tennisadam
Mar 2nd 2006, 1:15 am
Let me know if I'm summarizing this correctly:
a) 1-way links are much more beneficial than recip-links.
b) If you recip-link, only do it with a related site.
How to get 1-way links?
a) Directory submissions
b) Article submissions
c) Having good content that people link to (this sounds like it rarely happens though?)
d) Pay someone for a 1-way link (ie through Link Brokers)
Did I summarize this properly? I have been bad with my link-building. I pose the question to the experts here, how would you put together a plan for promotion according to the 4 ways to get 1-way links above?
For example:
Day 1 - main goal: Directory Submissions
submit to dmoz, ..., ..., etc.... [ 3 hours ]
Work on writing an article [ 2 hours ]
Day 2 - main goal: Submit Article
Finish writing article [ 2 hours ]
Submit article to PR Web
Day 3-6 - main goal: Write content for your site - hopefully something quality enough that someone would want to link to it (but not steal it)
Day 7 - rest ;-)
Week 2 -
Some more directory submissions...
Write more content.
Submit another article?
This is what I really don't understand -- how much can you really promote something? For example, how much time does it take to submit to all worthwhile directories? At what point, does the promotion you do become strictly content writing, and article releases?
Thanks in advance.
seo_expert
Mar 2nd 2006, 2:31 am
one-way links are best choice to start with...
E.g being famous websites like Google, yahoo! or msn have very high PR for the fact that everyone likes to link to them (One-way).
But there is no such penalty on Reciprocal links from Google.
That's Right, One - way links are the best for getting rankings and making for your website more strongers in search engines placements. It will give you good PR as well as good rankings.
So, Keep on One-way Links which includes directory submissions, forums signatures, blogs, articles etc.
Regards,
Amit Verma
genkied
Mar 4th 2006, 8:47 am
is a one way link came from a directry site gives a factor?
eWeOnline
May 13th 2006, 1:16 am
is a one way link came from a directry site gives a factor?
If it is from a SE friendly directory, That will help you to build backlinks to your site.
windtalker
May 13th 2006, 3:36 pm
1-way links are better
reciprocals links are good when it is with related and semi-related theme sites
there isn't a penalty for reciprocals links. I see websites in the top ten in google for competitive keywords with almost all the links pointing to them are reciprocal
netprophet
Sep 21st 2006, 3:26 am
1-way links are better
reciprocals links are good when it is with related and semi-related theme sites
there isn't a penalty for reciprocals links. I see websites in the top ten in google for competitive keywords with almost all the links pointing to them are reciprocal
But these reciprocal pages have good pr as well as quality content.
If you place your reciprocal link on that page, then you'll be benefited
unless there is no benefit. :)
Jasonb
Sep 21st 2006, 8:36 pm
its not just 1 way links your after, its also relevant links.
igcorrec
Sep 21st 2006, 9:08 pm
I find reciprocal linking to related-content sites is the best way to build traffic...
findmesoftware
Aug 13th 2008, 8:17 pm
Yes, I agree one way link is better than reciprocal link. Search engines count "relevant" one way link as 1 vote---- reciprocal link as half vote.....
lincolnpark
Aug 14th 2008, 12:37 am
wow, 2 year bump
sheds
Aug 14th 2008, 12:49 am
I find reciprocal linking to related-content sites is the best way!
Rajonkumar
Jul 24th 2009, 1:24 am
How can I build one way link in different isp?If anyone know the answer hen please tell me the details about it.
qdm
Jul 24th 2009, 8:48 am
One way links are what you want.
Link exchanges do not carry any where near as much link juice as one way links.
Shrek001
Oct 3rd 2009, 6:19 am
Does this mean that a one way link from a non relevant page is of no worth to Google rankings?
wordgeist
Oct 4th 2009, 12:05 am
how can I build reciprocal links?
eyezshine
Oct 4th 2009, 2:04 pm
Reciprocal links work just as good as one way links. I have tested both. Anchor text is what pushes your pages up the results.
wordgeist
Oct 4th 2009, 8:52 pm
any body knows how bing ranks the reciprocal linking?
harryoxford
Oct 4th 2009, 9:41 pm
one way and two link exchange are different names of links but both are the worth full in Google
Shrek001
Oct 28th 2009, 8:41 am
Totally agree, I only have reciprocal links.
Draconian
Oct 28th 2009, 9:15 am
Nice one year bump on top of the two year bump there by the way...
riks3140
Oct 28th 2009, 11:25 am
Yes its right that one way linking is better than reciprocal links, but one way linking is really hard.
Getting reciprocal links is far much easier and cheaper but for me both seems to be impossible, as I am loooking for .edu domain sites for link building of my site but no success yet.. Completely messed up :(..
ny one can help...pls rep
shobi khan
Oct 28th 2009, 11:03 pm
I think two way linking is best. It will work best for websites
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.