Which one is accurate

[aj845]

I have extreme tracking, google analytic and stat counter. Which is more acurate. Last sunday extreme tracking showed 10000UV for one of my website but analytic and stat counter showed very low UV compare to extreme tracking.
Why is that?

[benefita]

I think google analytics is most acurate

[crazyenglish]

I use sitestats.biz and it gives lots of information, and seems pretty accurate when I compare to other stats sites. It gives loads of options, some of the most useful being "keyword Analysis", "Came from" and "Viisitor Activity and Paths" which includes a pie chart showing visitor time spent on your site(split into "up to a minute", "up to 5 mins", 10, 20 and 20+), particularly useful if you use referral sites!

Oh yes, it's free as well.

[ayahshiva]

yes i think google analytics it good, and now you can have google analytic on your desktop.
visit here (http://shiva.web.id/2007/11/14/analytics-reporting-suite/) for more info.

[energy.fs]

i think u should try ...google analytics or awstats ....awstats is far better then google and its free ....24 hrs update time and lots of features ...

[aj845]

it' so weird one of my site ha extreme tracking and it saying that I have received 17000 n counting UV today, but when i login to statcounter it say i only have 2500 UV today. Who is accurate?

[Wyla]

statcounter.. had the same thing. I compared 4 trackers (extreme/stat/google/aw) and foudn the extreme is pretty inaccurate.

[ayahshiva]

i think u should try ...google analytics or awstats ....awstats is far better then google and its free ....24 hrs update time and lots of features ...

awstats? i never heard of it, i should try i. by the why don't you give the link

[Wyla]

its usually built into the server (if you are buying hosting like I assume you are).

[ayahshiva]

its usually built into the server (if you are buying hosting like I assume you are).

oh yeah, i remember now.
i can see it on my control panel

[XuryaX]

I think Awstats with Cpanel is most accurate. It requires no code and does everythin on its own. So pretty much its most accurate.

[SuperBlog]

Sitecounter and Analytics. However, none can be perfectly accurate since they are scripts, and if the visitor doesn't stay on the page until the script loads, pushes the "stop loading page" button before the script loads, etc. that visitor will not be tracked.

[shoaeeb]

Google analytics may be more accurate

[Damweb]

If your using the paid version of extremetracking.com and not the free one, then that inflates the stats.

[Dvae]

statcounter and awstat

[gsv13]

google analytics nothing can be compared ..... even close!

[jg_abad]

i use google analytics and statcounter and both giving almost same result. i like statcounter due to good navigation and way of presentation. i will go for this two for accurate result.