rochow
Jun 14th 2007, 7:59 pm
Ok, this is not some "omg I got infractions, the sky is falling bitch thread"
I would like someone, or multiple people to define exactly what a bump is/is not, as it's pretty vague at the moment.
For example, I got an infraction for this post:
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=3407766#post3407766
Ok fair enough, I posted half an hour after he did, resulting in a bit of a bump.
This one:
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=3448906#post3448906
Again, I guess it could be considered a bump. I used to do this ages ago (like last year) with no problem, it's only the last couple of days I've been struck for it. I find it helpful because it gives everyone an overview of where the threads at, and saves the hassle when people bid the same as someone else because they are too lazy to read the whole thread (it happens, just not in mine :))
But this one...
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=365348
There is no way I consider this to be a bump (my post was deleted). I posted "oh you're bad :P" maximum 5 minutes after he posted a starting bid at $6. How many places would that have "bumped" it up? Like 4, 5? That is not a bump as far as I'm concerned, because it was already up the top. I was not trying to move my dead, no-ones interested thread from ages back to the top.
IMO: Bumping is a post in order to move your thread from the bottom or a couple of pages back, to the front.
I have been gone for a while and the mods seem to have different stance than before. So what is the current definition of a bump? Can we update the rules or something for old timers like me who still are acting the same as last year?
I would like someone, or multiple people to define exactly what a bump is/is not, as it's pretty vague at the moment.
For example, I got an infraction for this post:
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=3407766#post3407766
Ok fair enough, I posted half an hour after he did, resulting in a bit of a bump.
This one:
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=3448906#post3448906
Again, I guess it could be considered a bump. I used to do this ages ago (like last year) with no problem, it's only the last couple of days I've been struck for it. I find it helpful because it gives everyone an overview of where the threads at, and saves the hassle when people bid the same as someone else because they are too lazy to read the whole thread (it happens, just not in mine :))
But this one...
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=365348
There is no way I consider this to be a bump (my post was deleted). I posted "oh you're bad :P" maximum 5 minutes after he posted a starting bid at $6. How many places would that have "bumped" it up? Like 4, 5? That is not a bump as far as I'm concerned, because it was already up the top. I was not trying to move my dead, no-ones interested thread from ages back to the top.
IMO: Bumping is a post in order to move your thread from the bottom or a couple of pages back, to the front.
I have been gone for a while and the mods seem to have different stance than before. So what is the current definition of a bump? Can we update the rules or something for old timers like me who still are acting the same as last year?