View Full Version : Anti Image Leeching Software?
popoman
Mar 6th 2007, 2:44 am
I'm particularly interested in a software/script which simply protects images on a website from being downloaded by mass downloader apps... Any ideas?
Thanks.
Pat Gael
Mar 6th 2007, 3:34 am
You can create your own anti-leech protection by simply editing your .htaccess file or downloading a script for doing such task.
Further information in both options is available here:
www.xentrik.net/htaccess/antileech.php
http://blog.evisio.no/?view=plink&id=122
popoman
Mar 6th 2007, 4:02 am
You can create your own anti-leech protection by simply editing your .htaccess file or downloading a script for doing such task.
Further information in both options is available here:
www.xentrik.net/htaccess/antileech.php
http://blog.evisio.no/?view=plink&id=122
Thanks, but it seems that using the .htaccess will prevent people from viewing my images if they find them directly in a Google search for example... Am I correct?
I'll try evisio tho, and see what happens. Thx!
popoman
Mar 6th 2007, 4:41 am
Also I wanted to ask... Is there a special way in which a downloader app connects to a website which is different from when a browser connects to it, and is there a way to allow just browsers to connect to a website etc...?
ajsa52
Mar 6th 2007, 4:46 am
Thanks, but it seems that using the .htaccess will prevent people from viewing my images if they find them directly in a Google search for example... Am I correct?
Google thumbnails are on Google servers.
ajsa52
Mar 6th 2007, 5:07 am
Also I wanted to ask... Is there a special way in which a downloader app connects to a website which is different from when a browser connects to it, and is there a way to allow just browsers to connect to a website etc...?
Well, each browser or app should use their "user-agent", and you can use that on your .htaccess or your server programs (PHP, PERL, ...).
But that "user-agent" can be changed also on some downloader apps. FOr example "--user-agent" option for wget.
plumsauce
Mar 9th 2007, 1:31 pm
The idea of examing the user-agent string is still of value.
It will stop the casual downloader who does not know about user-agent strings. Just be aware that someone who is determined to rip your site will still do it.
Forrest
Mar 9th 2007, 4:19 pm
That's assuming people are skilled and knowledgeable enough to write their own leaching software, but not enough to set the user agent string. I would guess 90 % of people who grab images en masse are using off-the-shelf software to do it. Some of the programs identify themselves, others mimic a browser.
I don't have a list of any of them, but Google can find you one pretty quickly, and you can at least make some headway, banning some of the mass downloaders is probably better than none.
ajsa52
Mar 10th 2007, 1:21 am
I don't have a list of any of them, but Google can find you one pretty quickly, and you can at least make some headway, banning some of the mass downloaders is probably better than none.
Currently I'm using a small list on my .htaccess:
For apps:
"Wget"
"HTTrack"
"WebCopier"
"WebSauger"
"WebReaper"
"WebStripper"
"Web Downloader"
For unfriendly crawlers:
"aipbot"
"RufusBot"
"voyager"
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.