Is the site command completely screwed up?

[mikelbeck]

Does anybody else see bizarre results for these commands?

site:www.superstockhemis.com
site:www.northeastbracketracing.com

?

I see the first result from the correct site, but the rest are from sites like studystuff (dot) com, nyg-fans (dot) com, suphoto (dot) com.... What's up with this?

[Andrey Markin]

Does anybody else see bizarre results for these commands?
I don't! Just checked...

[yfs1]

The site: command hasn't been working right for months. Either it is on purpose or Google doesn't see it as a priority to fix it (I personally vote for the first reason)

[mikelbeck]

Here's how I see it...

Trying out different searches like this, I see it on a lot of vBulletin sites. I wonder if it's got something to do with that?

[Nintendo]

Compair the results on Google.com with the datacenters. Yes, Google is smoking pot!!!

http://www.seo-contests.com/cgi-local/google.cgi?search=site:superstockhemis.com
http://www.seo-contests.com/cgi-local/google.cgi?search=site:northeastbracketracing.com

[drhfinegifts]

I just did a site: and allinurl: check on my site, and other websites are showing up along with my webpages!

Yes, G is smoking dope again!

[mikelbeck]

Is yours a vBulletin site?

[Christopher]

Hah, yep, me too. Using site: command now provides irrelevent results, pages from other sites. (no, this is not just vbulletin sites).

I don't believe this is on purpose, as site specific searches are an important google function. Many webmasters give google traffic via site specific searches.

ps: and the other sites appear - before - my site - and they (the other sites listed before mine) are supplimental. hmmppff

[yfs1]

I don't believe this is on purpose, as site specific searches are an important google function. Many webmasters give google traffic via site specific searches.

Thats exactly my point. If you were trying to make SEO and link selling harder, what would you do?

[mikelbeck]

ps: and the other sites appear - before - my site - and they (the other sites listed before mine) are supplimental. hmmppff

Ah, I hadn't noticed that... Maybe the supplemental index is screwed up? The cached dates on most of the non-site links are old, too... Februrary, March, etc.

[nddb]

This is far beyond site: just not working properly.. or not displaying all pages. I'm seeing this :

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Anddb.net&btnG=Google+Search

For my site, the top resultsaren't even from my domain. ALSO, as you go through the pages, the number of results jumps around wildly.

The site: operator is totally jacked up right now... I can't imagine it's supposed to work like this.