Should there be another Matrix movie?

Cheap SEO Services

Jul 4th 2006, 12:30 am

I think there should be. I like all three of them.

JohnScott

Jul 4th 2006, 12:31 am

I liked the first one, but that was it for me.

fryman

Jul 4th 2006, 12:32 am

lol, I agree. I got lost after the first one

Albert_chu

Jul 4th 2006, 1:12 am

yeah the first one was good..the others went off in a tangent

digitalpoint

Jul 4th 2006, 11:43 am

Yeah, there probably shouldn't have been 3 of them. Maybe 2, but they really tried to stretch it out with 3.

lorien1973

Jul 4th 2006, 12:02 pm

Yeah after the first one, it kinda lost it for me. I don't even think I understand the end of the 3rd one.

just-4-teens

Jul 4th 2006, 12:22 pm

no a 4th would kill it completly.

rubeina

Jul 4th 2006, 12:27 pm

Ya I also agree with everybody, there should only be the first one. The third one was "yuck", a forth one will just make it worse.

donna-x

Jul 4th 2006, 12:29 pm

Ya I also agree with everybody, there should only be the first one. The third one was "yuck", a forth one will just make it worse.

agreed! i only enjoyed the first.

mcfox

Jul 4th 2006, 12:37 pm

They should make another one, except this time go back to the beginning and when the choice comes, Neo should take the blue pill (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluepill). It would have been preferable to Matrix 2 and Matrix 3 ;)

Manish Pandey

Jul 4th 2006, 2:44 pm

NO... there should not be any more of it... the III part was so boring...

konrad

Jul 5th 2006, 6:34 pm

I think there should.

ncaditya

Jul 5th 2006, 6:38 pm

Too many sequels and look alikes make reduce movies' cult like popularity. Take the example of Terminator. 1 and Judgement day were so superb but what about the third part? The terminator in the third part was just like a human even with expressions! But in 1 and Judgement day he was just like a machine. Changes do come in the characters with sequels.

KW802

Jul 6th 2006, 8:32 am

I think there should be. I like all three of them.No. The first one was great but by the end of third one I think the general feeling was "I waited all this time for this?" :(

debunked

Jul 6th 2006, 8:35 am

Yeah, there probably shouldn't have been 3 of them. Maybe 2, but they really tried to stretch it out with 3.

Totally!

The 2nd and 3rd had super long fight scenes that went on and on and on and on....

Could have been just a second that might have been good.

Ryan@MB

Jul 6th 2006, 8:38 am

I couldn't even sit through the first one and I was not even interested in two or three... but from what I heard they were not that good anyways so I can imagine if there was another one it would suck.

bigdealio

Jul 6th 2006, 10:04 am

The first one = awesome. Others........... not worth the time.

Tyler Banfield

Jul 6th 2006, 10:58 am

The first one = awesome. Others........... not worth the time.

Exactly. I fell asleep during the second one, and never saw the third one.

PLEASE, no more Keanu Reeves...

joelviztech

Jul 6th 2006, 11:51 am

The first one was a great movie, but the next two really brought down the series. Any future movies would blow even worse than the recent star wars sequels (i probably just pissed off a lot of nerds)

mixke

Jul 6th 2006, 11:57 am

the first one was the best of all ..bt i dont think that there should be the 4th one..gave it a thought ..cant understand the plot for the 4th one ..??

JustinL

Jul 6th 2006, 12:34 pm

After that horrible "rave" scene in the second one and the cheesy love scene, I didn't bother with the Third.

debunked

Jul 6th 2006, 12:37 pm

After that horrible "rave" scene in the second one and the cheesy love scene, I didn't bother with the Third.
We were warned so we fast forwarded the scenes - I had forgotten about that.

mattr2110

Jul 6th 2006, 2:15 pm

After that horrible "rave" scene in the second one and the cheesy love scene, I didn't bother with the Third.

No doubt I couldn't even make through the 2nd one

KeithLDick

Jul 6th 2006, 2:17 pm

I didn't like the second one at all and I will no doubt never see another sequel to The Matrix...

SumitBahl

Jul 6th 2006, 2:21 pm

As everyone said, first one was good, 3nd was OK, third went over the head.

But, i think, there still would be a 4th part.

kingofoverkill

Oct 29th 2006, 8:43 pm

Yes, in fact, I vote for at least 6 total.

Cheap SEO Services

Oct 29th 2006, 8:45 pm

Yes...More Matrix movies for me please....But should call it Octatrix for the 8th one :D

Cheap SEO Services

Oct 29th 2006, 8:46 pm

As everyone said, first one was good, 3nd was OK, third went over the head.

But, i think, there still would be a 4th part.

Oh! There a new number out. 1st, 2nd & 3nd!!!

hehehehehe.....Col :)

SumitBahl

Oct 30th 2006, 12:58 pm

Oh! There a new number out. 1st, 2nd & 3nd!!!

hehehehehe.....Col :)

lol, that was a typo. :o :p

drewbe121212

Oct 30th 2006, 8:13 pm

The first one was the best; the 2nd one was alright. With the third one I think they were making up as much stuff as they could then found a way to link it together.

In my opinion they ruined something that coul dhave been even better. Oh well, fun graphics/effects movie anyways.

Cheap SEO Services

Oct 30th 2006, 8:35 pm

lol, that was a typo. :o :p

I love typo's. Makes me have good belly laugh. WHOO-HOO-HAR-HAR-HAR!!! :D

Samba99

Nov 2nd 2006, 10:56 am

I think they should definitely make another, as long as they go back to the roots as in the first film.

hbalien

Nov 3rd 2006, 12:08 am

there definetely should be 4th movie!
i hope itll be done!!

sudharma88

Nov 3rd 2006, 3:52 am

think there should be. matrix is just
one of its kind