Google kicked out SEOChat from its index

sufyaaan

Mar 2nd 2006, 9:48 pm

Surprisingly enough, Google is on its way to completely delisting SEOChat.com from its index.

site:forums.seochat.com (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=http://forums.seochat.com%2F&btnG=Google+Search&meta=) shows no results.

site:www.seochat.com (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=www.seochat.com%2F&btnG=Google+Search&meta=) shows no results.

They are baffled to the bone and needs your help… Hehe… :D

fryman

Mar 2nd 2006, 9:52 pm

Results 1 - 10 of about 253,000 from www.seochat.com

I don't see any supplemental results... what have you been smoking?

sufyaaan

Mar 2nd 2006, 9:53 pm

I don't see any supplemental results... what have you been smoking?
http://forums.seochat.com/google-optimization-7/seochat-booted-from-google-72338.html?pp=15

fryman

Mar 2nd 2006, 9:56 pm

Weird, I see everything normal...

But it would be good to see them kicked out... maybe that will bring their stupid admins back to earth and get rid of the ads splattered all over the place

sufyaaan

Mar 2nd 2006, 9:59 pm

maybe that will bring their stupid admins back to earth

Completely agree.

clasione

Mar 2nd 2006, 10:05 pm

I have been seeing alot of weird things with this...

http://64.233.179.104/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&q=cache:http://www.linkadage.com/Brokerage/

http://64.233.179.104/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&q=cache:http://www.highrankings.com/issue161.htm

http://64.233.179.104/search?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&q=cache:http://www.textlinkbrokers.com/blogs/weblog.php

I think it is something else --- alot of sites are loosing pages :confused:

Dakait

Mar 2nd 2006, 10:10 pm

I have started learning SEO for seochat.com. It was having PR6 in Jan-Feb 2005. In next PR update it got PR8. But in next update...it lost PR8 and come back on PR6.

Now, it is PR7.

I was very found of seochat.com, but slowly my craze lost. I don't like its style, ads, article showing way, seo tools.

The traffic there is also going bit down, people seems to not taking interest in seochat.

I agree with both of you.

clasione

Mar 2nd 2006, 10:14 pm

The ad thing is really a problem.... The pages just take way too long to load ---- I learned alot there too and used to be one of the main members.... I really do not go on there any more.... It's a terrible thing....

alinush

Mar 2nd 2006, 10:15 pm

way too many ads for a forum.... it's bugging

Dakait

Mar 2nd 2006, 10:32 pm

Just talking about forums success and failure.

Why seochat forums failure?

Lots of Ads
Style and presentation
Heavy
No unique idea

What is the secret of DigitalPoint forums success?

Recent forum topic list in Keyword suggestion tool
Co-op Advertising Network
Simple, No Ads, Good Look, fast
Adsense revenew sharing

or What?

sufyaaan

Mar 2nd 2006, 10:37 pm

mad4

Mar 3rd 2006, 6:52 am

Was just reading about seochat forums being de-listed from google and hadn't seen it on DP so here is the link (http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/003422.html).

Nobody at seochat (http://forums.seochat.com/google-optimization-7/seochat-booted-from-google-72338.html) seems to know whats going on.

T0PS3O

Mar 3rd 2006, 6:57 am

Ouch... Since DPF gets about 60% of its traffic from Google, this might well piss off their advertisers enough to be the end... Nicely tying in with Yfs1's post I just read.

Just noticed it was mentioned already: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=62428

yfs1

Mar 3rd 2006, 7:09 am

They are still calling it "flux"....Ownership knows very little about SEO over there and you could see this coming a mile away.

Michael_Goldman

Mar 3rd 2006, 7:12 am

nothing here, I see all the pages indexed too..
Also I've just found my recent site was indexed and that's cool :)

mdvaldosta

Mar 3rd 2006, 7:12 am

Interesting stuff. The BigDaddy DC's are the one's deindexing... a sign of things to come for them.

mad4

Mar 3rd 2006, 7:46 am

A lot of people on seochat are analyzing the pages and talking about over use of nofollow links etc. It seems that the people posting have little confidence in the people who do the design work.

I was laughing when somebody said "hey why do my signature links have nofollow" and started talking about sneaky tactics or something.

yfs1

Mar 3rd 2006, 8:00 am

It seems that the people posting have little confidence in the people who do the design work.
They are just doing what they are told...The no follow thing was a ridiculous option based on really bad SEO.

There are also a lot more similar things going on. (http://www.yfs1.com/2006/forums-inflating-online-guests-and-membership-to-advertisers.html)

mad4

Mar 3rd 2006, 8:24 am

There are also a lot more similar things going on. (http://www.yfs1.com/2006/forums-inflating-online-guests-and-membership-to-advertisers.html)

Yeah, I read that this morning.

Picking one page (http://forums.seochat.com/google-optimization-7/) at random there are literally hundreds of nofollow links on the page. I am not going to bother trying to figure out what they have done wrong (if anything) but if you try and use any dubious practices in seo then you may get burned.

cpvr

Mar 7th 2006, 5:43 pm

This is quite an interesting article, hate to see SEOChat being de-indexed:
http://www.theforumfix.com/forum-news/google-waver-goodbye-to-seochat.htm

nOR

Mar 7th 2006, 5:45 pm

thats a bummer for them.

o wait its fake :rolleyes:

Sem-Advance

Mar 7th 2006, 6:02 pm

Yes especially when it's wrong.

Whoever posted that is ill

seochat is not going to be deindexed....

They have a Google PR of 7 that shows...probably an 8 in Google Internally...

Results 1 - 10 of about 12,600 from www.seochat.com

thats 12,000+ pages in Googles index....deindexed would = 0

Why doesn't the person who thinks seochat will be deindexed worry about their site...

I doubt it is a resource of any value whatsoever.

It should also be noted I write for seochat.com but would post the same thing if a fool has posted WPW was to be deindexed...

1,000,000 to 1 says the poster is an "seo"

LOL

EGS

Mar 7th 2006, 6:05 pm

Actually it appears to be the smart thing to do for SEOChat. :)

Sem-Advance

Mar 7th 2006, 6:09 pm

uhhh huh and we will all flock to webmastertalk. US????

you couldnt find a better brand name???

seochat owns your azzzz lol

and again Id say it if I did not write for them.....

EGS

Mar 7th 2006, 6:15 pm

uhhh huh and we will all flock to webmastertalk. US????

you couldnt find a better brand name???

seochat owns your azzzz lol

and again Id say it if I did not write for them.....
Excuse me? You must be SEO-impaired because what they are doing will dramatically increase their keyword search rankings...

I don't have time to teach you SEO right now or argue, but don't try to offend me please as I am not offending you.

Thanks.

Sem-Advance

Mar 7th 2006, 6:16 pm

You missed one of the most important reasons why SC failed - Stupid admins :D

Apparently the post does not like the mods at seochat....

probably due to the fact makes idiot like posts claiming seochat will be delisted LOL

Most of the admins and mods on seochat are very well respected by Google Yahoo & Msn

see this for what it is a pissed off "seo" not getting props on seochat

lol

Christopher

Mar 7th 2006, 6:41 pm

Silly article. Tricks are for kids.

A little more research and the author would find this is just another google screw up. There tends to be a lot of those lately... but I already ranted about that on another thread so I'll leave it at that here.

PGZ

Mar 7th 2006, 6:54 pm

uhhh huh and we will all flock to webmastertalk. US????

you couldnt find a better brand name???

seochat owns your azzzz lol

and again Id say it if I did not write for them.....

Dude get off your FREAKING high horse......Webmastertalk said nothing to deserve such comments from you.....

Remember your a writer.....that's all you are....YOU own NO ONE.

If you actually did OWN someone you'd be a little further in life than trying to belittle someone cause you think your freaking special or something. If I owned SEOchat you be an unemployed writer about right now because of your unprofessionalism while using the SEOchat name as a backdrop.

Webmastertalk dont let this peon even bother you in the least.....remember he's a freaking writer blah blah blah....

PGZ:mad:

Dekker

Mar 7th 2006, 7:00 pm

do you mean something not someone? to own someone would be illegal.

GeorgeB.

Mar 7th 2006, 7:09 pm

I love lamp.

classifieds

Mar 7th 2006, 7:09 pm

seochat is suffering from the same thing that is affecting many large sites.

There are discussions going on in quite a few forums about the problems that G is having:

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=62225

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=62519

http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/33386.htm

Sem-Advance

Mar 7th 2006, 7:27 pm

PGZ (http://forums.digitalpoint.com/member.php?u=4596) http://forums.digitalpoint.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif vbmenu_register("postmenu_694513", true);
Berserker

Ummm I did not say I owned anyone...learn to read,,,AND comprehend

I am much more than an author..

get off your high horse yourself

...I don't work for anyone but myself., so it would be very hard for seochat to fire me.

webmastertalk is no authority to comment on seochat and or dev hardware for those missing the larger picture and the resources they have been / are.... before many of you hopped on the net....

They have issues, as do all large sites....but to post they are being de-indexed and or should be is wrong and immature IE: webmastertalks post was a stab at seochat to try to garner publicity to his own site .....and I won't mention a shot to DP forums....

Most of you should try and have those problems.

"Judge not the splinter in anothers eye, till you have removed the tree from your own"

....hops down off his 1/2" soapbox....

see not so high horse

and PGZ if you get that irate over a forum post you'll be dead from a heart attack much too young...take a chill pill

Peace

Dekker

Mar 7th 2006, 7:29 pm

AGH learn how to format damnit, no one can read that :P

Sem-Advance

Mar 7th 2006, 7:34 pm

Excuse me? You must be SEO-impaired because what they are doing will dramatically increase their keyword search rankings...

I don't have time to teach you SEO right now or argue, but don't try to offend me please as I am not offending you.

Thanks.

MMm yes what they are doing is going to increase their keyword rankings...I guess it would okay for your site to increase it rankings but it is wrong of seochat.com to do the same????

me thinks you speak with forked tongue...

No, you don't have the time to teach me SEO...first you would have to learnSEO....

That would take you years....many years and by that time ....I will start to forget most of what I know about SEO,,,,, though what I forget will always be more than you will ever know......;)

Peace

schlottke

Mar 7th 2006, 7:39 pm

What are you talking about?

nOR

Mar 7th 2006, 8:05 pm

MMm yes what they are doing is going to increase their keyword rankings...I guess it would okay for your site to increase it rankings but it is wrong of seochat.com to do the same????

me thinks you speak with forked tongue...

No, you don't have the time to teach me SEO...first you would have to learnSEO....

That would take you years....many years and by that time ....I will start to forget most of what I know about SEO,,,,, though what I forget will always be more than you will ever know......;)

Peace

are those valid points or are you writing for a rap battle? :rolleyes:

Sem-Advance

Mar 7th 2006, 8:15 pm

No actually I have no clue why I write anymore

I try teaching people... and they act ignorant ...nothing new there...

meanwhile I'm making more than enough ....and in doing so I found I dont need to take anyones bullshit...

so I barely post anymore in fact I quit writing..

I can write all I want.... if I make money and nobody listens... then who gives a shit what anybody else does....

I know I don't more and more

now I remember why

Have a good life...

I'm out of the kiddy bullshit again.....

Peace

PGZ

Mar 7th 2006, 8:19 pm

1. It should also be noted I write for seochat.com

Then you say....

I am much more than an author

??????????????

2.seochat owns your azzzz lol

Then you say...

Ummm I did not say I owned anyone...learn to read,,,AND comprehend

again ????????????? I understood exactly what you meant and said. It seems as though you cant understand what you have said and you have back tracked on both of what I pointed out above.

AGH learn how to format damnit, no one can read that

Seems as though you read it just fine.

do you mean something not someone? to own someone would be illegal.

Ummmmmmmmm ok whatever guy. Maybe you should go read again also.

PGZ

Sem-Advance

Mar 7th 2006, 8:19 pm

Sem-Advance

Mar 7th 2006, 8:22 pm

PGZ

One last time

I DO NOT OWN SEOCHAT

therefore I never said I owned anyone....nor would I want to...

learn to fricken read assclown

:D

PGZ

Mar 7th 2006, 8:31 pm

PGZ

One last time

I DO NOT OWN SEOCHAT

therefore I never said I owned anyone....nor would I want to...

learn to fricken read assclown

:D

Still on that high horse huh ???????? LOL

I knew what ya meant and you meant it in a smartass way because you are a writer for SEOchat. Should we get on our knees and praise you then ??? Please get over it. You did it to try to belittle someone.

Your funny too.....Read this

One last time

I DO NOT OWN SEOCHAT

In case you havent noticed....THATS THE FIRST TIME YOU SAID THAT. You sorta said it in different words but never said it. So you should of rephrased it and and said FIRST and LAST TIME rather than LAST time only.:D

PGZ

nOR

Mar 7th 2006, 8:38 pm

PS Nor

All four of the sites in your sig file have zero Google PR

I can say all of my sites including a casino site have a Google PR 3 or higher...

My casino site has a Google PR four lol (Thank you JC) :rolleyes: and that is after a server move...

do I have valid points????? nah not me...lol

Peace

I'm out of the kiddy bullshit again.....

Hey a kiddie comeback! Cool!

Hmm I might have to speak to Google about why teknetik shows up as PR3 in their own toolbar!

And yes, all those sites are less then a month old, why would they have PR? (not that it matters, they all make money)

And last time I checked I only had 3 of my sites listed in my sig, thanks for noticing though :p

Any more stupid questions or moronic comments I can answer/rebuttal for you?

No actually I have no clue why I write anymore
I don't think anyone does

yfs1

Mar 8th 2006, 1:00 am

Most of the admins on seochat are very well respected

Now you are just making an ass of yourself as you have no clue on the ownership structure of SEOChat. Say what you will about whether you feel its a resource or not but you are the first person I have ever read that posted that the "Admins" are respected. I could go into what ownership does behind the scenes all day long but I am pretty sure it will be wasted on you.

As far as being an author for them, not sure I would brag about that either. They have hardly any review process except to make sure the grammar and spelling is acceptable.

And lastly, the initial posters observations were valid whether there is an explanation for them or not. Your idiot posts that followed it however are a different story.

Blogmaster

Mar 8th 2006, 1:19 am

you are a writer for SEOchat.
Now there is a compliment :rolleyes: I remember Danny Wall .. another great example of what happens when a good forum gets bought by the wrong people ...

yfs1

Mar 8th 2006, 1:35 am

Now there is a compliment :rolleyes: I remember Danny Wall .. another great example of what happens when a good forum gets bought by the wrong people ...
I somehow doubt Sem even knows who that is

Nintendo

Mar 8th 2006, 3:10 am

GoogleGuy says everything should be back to normal in about a week.

Based on the specifics everyone has sent (thank you, by the way), I'm pretty sure what the issue is. I'll check with the crawl/indexing team to be sure though. Folks don't need to send any more emails unless they really want to. It may take a week or so to sort this out and be sure, but I do expect these pages to come back to the main index.